
Originally Posted by
Ghostdog
That is unless you have a large bag of money and celebrity like David Crosby or any of the other folks who seem to get pushed to the head of the line (even though we constantly hear the mantra of Age, Blood type, Height, Weight and Condition being the only factors involved in the selection process). Some are more equal than others! I'd be more comfortable with a blind lottery for the selection process if someone is going to decide and include judgements on future worth. No one can judge what a persons Earthly worth is or how much they give back to those around them or to society. Tough choice to make but suppose the leading candidate was a complete prick, mentally healthy etc etc but mean to his mother and kicked puppies. The guy that would scream "Get Off My Lawn" at the neighborhood kids. Would he be more worthy than an innocent (but damaged) child. They could take some lessons from the current political dog fight and get special interest groups to advocate for the people in need and against those that are to be deemed unworthy. Looks like the (claimed) criterion is pretty black and white as far as who is more worthy well lets go all reality TV and let the unwashed masses help with the decision. Lets bring back the equivilent of Queen and a Day, Extreme Body Make over, Biggest Winner, Slumdog Transplant Receipient. Lets get the public to vote on worthiness based on scripted presentations. The commercials and the small 800 number fee for voting could even fund the procedures. Great way to advocate for new shows too. Have Turtleman show up in the recovery room to cheer for the reciepient "Yeee Yeee Yeee Yeee Yeee---Yee Yee" then hand Dr House a live 65 pound snapping turtle and yell out, "Live Action baby"! fade to the credits!
Bookmarks